Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
The development of new technological capabilities is of great scientific and practical importance for the development of countries, both from the point of view of the macroeconomic theory of economic growth and the theory of strategic innovation management of the firm. According to the main scientific schools of macroeconomic theory, the stability of economic growth is usually supported by several important factors, among which three of the most important of them can be distinguished, namely capital accumulation, population growth and technological progress (technological capabilities). At the same time, at the end of the last century, the founders of the new growth theory presented a model of endogenous growth in which the importance of technology and innovation as a source of economic growth was emphasized, and since then the concept of innovation and economic growth has become an attractive area of research for scientists. The purpose of this article is to study the methodological concept of the possibilities of integrating the development factor of technological capabilities in macroeconomic models of economic growth. The article includes a methodological discussion of the prerequisites for macroeconomic models, taking into account the conclusions from the research of the concept of technological capabilities at the aggregated level. At the same time, the article summarizes various determinants and mechanisms of the development of technological capabilities, and they are consistent with the current understanding of the development of technological capabilities within the framework of macroeconomic models. Based on these results, the article suggests some hypotheses about the extent to which it is possible to integrate these determinants into theoretical macroeconomic models in the macroeconomic theory of economic growth. The results of the author's research once again confirm the thesis that, using the example of advanced innovative countries, the Russian Federation should also base its economic growth strategy on policies that promote the expansion of technological capabilities and policies that create incentives for innovation.
macroeconomic theory, macroeconomic model, development of technological capabilities, economic growth, innovative dynamics
1. Hidalgo C. Economic complexity: From useless to keystone. January 2018, Nature Physics 14(1): 9-10
2. Hausmann R. "Venezuela's Growth Implosion: A Neo-Classical Story." In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth. Ed. Dani Rodrik. Princeton University Press, 2003.
3. Abramov, R. Diversifikaciya ekonomiki regionov na osnove innovacionnogo razvitiya / Ruslan Abramov. - M.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2017. - 228 c.
4. Nelson R. A perspective on the evolution of evolutionary economics. October 2020, Industrial and Corporate Change 29 (3).
5. Winter S. Pursuing the evolutionary agenda in economics and management research. May 2017, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(3):721-747
6. Aktual'nye problemy Evropy. Evropa i Rossiya. Innovacionnoe razvitie i modernizaciya ekonomik. - M.: INION RAN, №1. 254 c. 2018
7. Freeman, C., Louçã, F. As times goes by: the information revolution and the industrial revolutions in historical perspective. Oxford University Press, 2001.
8. Aktual'nye problemy Evropy. Vypusk №1(2013). Evropa i Rossiya. Innovacionnoe razvitie i modernizaciya ekonomik: monogr. - M.: Institut nauchnoy informacii po obschestvennym naukam (INION) RAN, 2016. - 900 c.
9. Akulova, E. Innovacionnye resheniya na puti k effektivnomu razvitiyu ekonomiki Rossii / Ekaterina Akulova. - M.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2014. - 680 c.
10. Asanov, A. Innovacionnaya sistema upravleniya ekonomikoy regiona / Aleksandr Asanov. - M.: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2016. - 180 c.
11. Auzan, A.A. Innovacionnoe razvitie ekonomiki Rossii. Mezhdisciplinarnoe vzaimodeystvie. Sbornik statey / A.A. Auzan. - M.: Prospekt, 2016. - 646 c.
12. Baburin, V. L. Innovacionnye cikly v rossiyskoy ekonomike / V.L. Baburin. - Moskva: RGGU, 2014. - 120 c.
13. Bazilevich, A.I. Innovacionnyy menedzhment i ekonomika organizaciy (predpriyatiy): praktikum. Grif UMO VUZov Rossii: monogr. / A.I. Bazilevich. - M.: Infra-M, Vuzovskiy uchebnik, 2016. - 669 c.
14. Bogatova, E.V. Innovacionnaya ekonomika. Monografiya / E.V. Bogatova. - M.: Rusayns, 2015. - 897 c.
15. Borisov V.N. i dr., Modernizaciya promyshlennosti i razvitie vysokotehnologichnyh proizvodstv v kontekste «zelenogo rosta». Pod redakciey akademika Porfir'eva B.N. – M.: Nauchnyy konsul'tant, 2017. – 434 s.
16. Borisov V.N. i dr., Prognozirovanie innovacionnogo mashinostroeniya. M.: MAKS Press, 2015. –180s.
17. Borisov V.N. i dr. Innovacionno-tehnologicheskoe razvitie ekonomiki Rossii: problemy, faktory, strategii, prognozy. - M.: MAKS PRESS, 2005. - 591 s.
18. Matrizaev B.D. Issledovanie teoretiko-metodologicheskih osobennostey makroekonomicheskoy ocenki posledstviy tehnologicheskih izmeneniy i ih effektivnosti// Problemy Prognozirovaniya. – 2022. – № 2. – S. 155-168. – ISSN 0868-6351.
19. Matrizaev B.D. Issledovanie mehanizmov opredeleniya struktury i evolyucii innovacionnyh sistem// Problemy Prognozirovaniya. – 2021. – № 5. – S. 139-148. – ISSN 0868-6351.
20. Matrizaev B.D. Issledovanie gipoteticheskih osnov strategii tehnologicheskoy modernizacii i povysheniya innovacionnogo potenciala v stranah s bystrorastuschey ekonomikoy. Ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. № 1 (53). S. 15-21. 2019.
21. Frolov I. E., Tresoruk A. A. K voprosu o prognozirovanii vysokotehnologichnyh proizvodstv v sovremennyh usloviyah: teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty // Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnohozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN. 2022. S. 7-40.
22. Acemoglu D. Localised and Biased Technologies: Atkinson and Stiglitz's New View, Induced Innovations, and Directed Technological Change. March 2015The Economic Journal 125(583)
23. Setterfield M. Endogenous Growth: A Kaldorian Approach. Working Papers 1001, Trinity College, Department of Economics, 2010.
24. Martins-Neto A., Ribeiro R.S.M. A neo-Kaleckian model of skilled-biased technological change and income distribution. Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 292-307, July, 2019.
25. Dosi G., Nuvolari A. Introduction: Chris Freeman's "History, Co-Evolution and Economic Growth": An affectionate reappraisal. Industrial and Corporate Change 29(4):1021-1034, August 2020.
26. Caiani A., Godin A., Lucarelli S. A Stock Flow Consistent Analysis of a Schumpeterian Innovation Economy. Metroeconomica 65(3), February 2014. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12045.
27. Ciarli T., Coad A., Rafols I. Quantitative analysis of technology futures: A review of techniques, uses and characteristics. Science and Public Policy 43(5): scv059. October 2015
28. Grossman G. M. Pollution and Growth: What Do We Know? DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751905.003
29. Helpman E. The Mystery of Economic Growth. The Belknap press of Harvard University press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England, 2004
30. Hötte K., Su Jung J., Sugandha S. Knowledge for a warmer world: a patent analysis of climate change adaptation technologies. INET Oxford Working Papers, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, 2021.
31. Rengs B., Scholz-Wäckerle M., Van den Bergh J. Evolutionary macroeconomic assessment of employment and innovation impacts of climate policy packages. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 169, 332-368, December 2019.
32. Dawid H., Neugart M. Effects of technological change and automation on industry structure and (wage-)inequality: insights from a dynamic task-based model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 33(1), December 2022
33. Baumol W.J., Litan R., Schramm C. J., Strom R. J. Innovative Entrepreneurship and Policy: Toward Initiation and Preservation of Growth. November 2011. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2623-4_1
34. Wolff E. Spillover, Linkages, and Productivity Growth in the US Economy, 1958 to 2007. March 2011. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646685.003.01
35. Deneckere R., Judd K. L. Cyclical and Chaotic Behavior in a Dynamic Equilibrium Model, with Implications for Fiscal Policy. February 2021. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19fvxt1.17
