Reasons for ignoring strategic initiatives in modern concepts of the strategic development of macroeconomic systems: theoretical and methodological aspect
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The relevance of this study is determined by the fact that in modern conditions at the level of the national economy, serious problems remain in ensuring the effectiveness of its development. Considering as one of the problems of the strategic development of the national economy the fact that in the formation of development strategies based on initiatives "from above", initiatives "from below" are not properly taken into account in this study, from a theoretical and methodological position, the question of why this happens ? As a methodological basis in this review, the model for the development of intra-corporate strategic initiatives by R. Burgelman, modified in terms of taking into account the operational level of the organization at the level, was used. By drawing analogies between the development strategies of microeconomic and macroeconomic systems, the main reasons for ignoring strategic initiatives in the development of the domestic economy are identified. It is shown that the main reason for ignoring strategic initiatives in modern concepts of the strategic development of the domestic economy is the very implemented model of state-monopoly capitalism, in which the monopolist is not interested in the very fact of implementing strategic initiatives, since he is already satisfied with the current situation. It is demonstrated that the monopoly position of many large companies in modern Russia, controlled by the state, is accompanied by agency conflicts between the economic interests of the state and top managers assigned to manage these companies in the interests of the state, which consists in the fact that it is much more profitable for top managers of these companies to show a higher a share of the company's costs, part of which should be appropriated in one form or another, rather than demonstrating high profits that will have to be distributed jointly with the state as the founder. It has been established that it is precisely this fundamental difference between state-monopoly capitalism and private capitalism according to K. Marx that leads to the fact that the top management of large companies in the domestic economy has no motivation to increase the economic efficiency of companies, and hence to take strategic initiatives.

Keywords:
reasons for neglect, strategic initiatives, modern concepts, strategic development, macroeconomic systems, theoretical and methodological aspect
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Minfin Rossii ot "Zakonoproekt o naloge na sverhpribyl' dlya krupnyh kompaniy odobren na zasedanii Pravitel'stva RF". https://www.consultant.ru/law/hotdocs/80645.html (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

2. «Spisok Belousova»: oligarhi kategoricheski ne zhelayut delit'sya halyavnymi sverhdohodami. https://tsargrad.tv/articles/spisok-belousova-oligarhi-kategoricheski-ne-zhelajut-delitsja-haljavnymi-sverhdohodami_154084 (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

3. ASI ne spravilos' so strategicheskim zadaniem Putina. Agentstvo raspiarennyh iniciativ. https://www.mk.ru/economics/2020/06/01/asi-ne-spravilos-so-strategicheskim-zadaniem-putina.html (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

4. Belousov otvetil Lisinu na anekdot slovami «delit'sya nado» https://www.rbc.ru/business/10/08/2018/5b6d93639a79472c3dddaa72 (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

5. Belyakov E. Strana nesbyvshihsya programm: Pochemu provalilas' Strategiya-2020? https://www.kp.ru/daily/27053.7/4119288/ (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

6. Beschastnova N.V., Sazykina M.Yu., Shalina O.I. Eksportno-syr'evaya model' razvitiya nacional'noy ekonomiki: posledstviya dlya obschestva i neobhodimost' reformirovaniya // Internet-zhurnal «Naukovedenie» Tom 7, №5 (2015) http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/59EVN515.pdf (dostup svobodnyy). (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

7. Vederina E. Ekonomisty raskritikovali novuyu strategiyu social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2021/05/13/869660-ekonomisti-raskritikovali (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

8. Gosudarstvo i goskompanii kontroliruyut 70% rossiyskoy ekonomiki. https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2016/09/29/658959-goskompanii-kontroliruyut-ekonomiki (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

9. Deputaty podderzhali vvedenie naloga na sverhpribyl'. http://duma.gov.ru/news/57563/ (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

10. Deripaska prizval stroit' ekonomiku ne «po ponyatiyam»https://www.rbc.ru/economics/03/07/2023/64a2939f9a7947bb90edf49a (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

11. Deficit federal'nogo byudzheta v 2023 godu prevysit planovye pokazateli. Eto podtverdil Anton Siluanov. https://dzen.ru/a/ZMbOTZq5J202CjZh (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

12. Dobycha treti nefti v Rossii budet nerentabel'noy bez nalogovyh l'got. https://www.vedomosti.ru/business/articles/2019/10/31/815248-tret-zapasov-nefti (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

13. Zhuravlev O. M., Matveev I. A. Gosudarstvennyy kapitalizm v Rossii: sostoyanie issledovaniy (chast' 1) // Evraziyskaya integraciya: ekonomika, pravo, politika. 2022. T. 16. № 2. S. 169–176

14. Zarubezhnov E.S. Formy proyavleniya gosudarstvennogo kapitalizma v sovremennoy Rossii. // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 21 (350). Ekonomika. Vyp. 47. S. 55-60.

15. Karagulyan E.A. Eksportoorientirovannaya model' ekonomicheskogo rosta: sravnitel'nyy analiz rossiyskogo i norvezhskogo opyta. // Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2014, №12, s.1-13.

16. Krylova A. «Razroznennymi proektami» nazval ekspert programmu strategicheskih iniciativ. https://radiokp.ru/ekonomika/razroznennymi-proektami-nazval-ekspert-programmu-strategicheskikh-iniciativ_nid484556_au45629au (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

17. Laktanciy. Bozhestvennye ustanovleniya. / Per., vstup. stat'ya i prim. V. M. Tyuleneva. (Seriya «Biblioteka hristianskoy mysli. Istochniki»). SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Olega Abyshko. 2007. - 512 s.

18. Marks K. Kapital. Kapital. Kritika politicheskoy ekonomii: [Perevod] / Karl Marks; Izd. pod red. [i s predisl., s. F. Engel'sa]. - Moskva: Politizdat, 1984. – 677 s.

19. Mishina D.V. Eksportno-syr'evaya model' ekonomicheskogo rosta kak faktor, prepyatstvuyuschiy innovacionnomu razvitiyu Rossii // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. – 2014. – № 9-3. – S. 644-648; URL: https://fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=34904 (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

20. Muntyan M. A., Podberezkin A. I., Strelyaev S. P. Privatizaciya i privatizatory. — M., Voskresen'e, 2005. — 308 s.

21. Nechaev A.A. Rossiya na perelome. Otkrovennye zapiski pervogo ministra ekonomiki: bez kupyur i cenzury / Andrey Nechaev. - Moskva: Olimp: Astrel', 2010. - 575 s.,

22. Nominal'nyy VVP stran mira v 2022 g. https://svspb.net/danmark/vvp-stran-nominal.php

23. (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

24. Pravitel'stvo gotovit novuyu strategiyu social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. https://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2021/02/02/856382-pravitelstvo-gotovit-novuyu-strategiyu-sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo-razvitiya (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

25. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 6 oktyabrya 2021 g. № 2816-r Ob utverzhdenii perechnya iniciativ social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya RF do 2030 g. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/402792803/ (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

26. Serebryanyy I. Strategiya 2030: kak ni sadis'…https://expert.ru/2021/05/17/strategiya-2030-kak-ni-sadis/ (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

27. Tebekin A.V. Detalizaciya "porochnogo kruga tenevogo sektora" Ernando De Soto primenitel'no k rossiyskoy ekonomike. // Vestnik Moskovskogo finansovo-yuridicheskogo universiteta MFYuA. 2022. № 4. S. 22-33.

28. Tebekin A.V. Perspektivy razvitiya nacional'noy ekonomiki v ramkah shestogo tehnologicheskogo uklada s uchetom uzhestocheniya zapadnyh sankciy. // Zhurnal issledovaniy po upravleniyu. 2022. T. 8. № 1. S. 17-37.

29. Tragediya velikoy derzhavy: nacional'nyy vopros i raspad Sovetskogo Soyuza / Pod red. G. N. Sevost'yanova. — M.: Social'no-politicheskaya mysl', 2005. — 600 s.

30. Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 21 iyulya 2020 g. № 474 “O nacional'nyh celyah razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federacii na period do 2030 goda”. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/74304210/ (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

31. Chernyh S. Gosudarstvennyy kapitalizm v Rossii: teoriya, praktika i sovremennye tendencii. // Obschestvo i ekonomika. 2021, №2, s.5-17.

32. Ekonomist Delyagin o Zabaykal'e: «Vse, chto vy mozhete proizvodit', — verevki, chtoby udavit'sya». https://delyagin.ru/articles/183-sobytija/107884-jekonomist-deljagin-o-zabaykal-e-vse-chto-vy-mozhete-proizvodit-verevki-chtoby-udavit-sja (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

33. Burgelman, R. A. «A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm». Administrative Science Quarterly (28, 1983a: 223–244).

34. Burgelman, R. A. «Managing Innovating Systems: A Study of the Process of Internal Cor porate Venturing» (Ph.D. dissertation. Graduate School of Business, Columbia Univer sity, 1980).

35. McKinsey Matrix GE Business Screen. Knowledge Center. https://www.12manage.com/methods_ge_mckinsey.html (data obrascheniya 01.08.2023)

36. Noda, T., and Bower, J. L. «Strategy Making as Iterated Processes of Resource Allocation». Strategic Management Journal (17, 1996: 159–192).


Login or Create
* Forgot password?